Skip to main content

Those who support rule by an unelected elite

There are people who seem happy to be ruled by an unelected elite. They believe that if this unelected elite use "scientific" decision making tools then the well-being of society and themselves will be ensured.

These people have full faith in national and international institutions which push for a world (seemingly) ruled by unelected technocrats.


These pro-elitist people are convinced that the power brokers of our world truly have the best interests of the people at heart, rather than the interests of a small group of connected associates, as investigative research suggests.

Such people have little real understanding of how international organisations work, what their true motives are and who and why they were set up in the first place.

The key characteristic of these "true believers" is that they believe what they are told by "authority figures" and refuse to dig deeper into the truth behind surface matters, or listen to those that have. Instead they take what is contrived by the media as truth.

This group of people are easily controlled due to their unquestioning nature and represent the kind of proletariat that the rulers of man wish all people were like, to enable them to rule in secret without being exposed, and have their agenda pass, without question or resistance.

This group confuse manufactured consensus for truth and are easily misled when authority figures that have been built up by the establishment over decades tell them to believe a certain thing.

These people are the real "sheeple" of our world and represent a danger to a truly free society that is not ruled by an unelected elite, for their blind support make such elite rule possible.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The only meaningful science on vaccines...

Is missing.

What is that science?
Comparing children who receive various regimes of vaccines against those who receive none at all, for a wide variety of health outcomes, over the next 15-20 years of their life, and beyond.
Such studies are not done because they are deemed unethical.

Why unethical? 

Because it is assumed that childhood vaccines do more good than harm, and that the current childhood vaccine schedule is fine, and to deny children vaccines when they are presumed safe and effective would be an act of criminal negligence.
Proof?
None, because it would be "unethical" to complete the studies that would prove this.

Catch-22, anyone?
Therefore, we don't know if these assumptions about safety and effectiveness are true or not.
And we never will, unless such comparative studies are done. 

And such studies would only be meaningful if conducted by someone without a dog in the fight- that is, not aligned with promoting or resisting community vaccine uptake.

And, as anyone…

A critical analysis of the flu vaccine - CHRIS KIRCKOF

It's flu season!

According to all official health reports, we are now fully in flu season. I remember being taught the seasons, why did my teachers keep the secret 5th season known as the flu a secret from me? It is that time of year when public health officials, physicians pediatricians and pharmacists warn that everyone over 6 months of age should protect themselves and get vaccinated. Most Americans, believing the government’s propaganda about the safety and benefits of the flu vaccine, are joining the inoculation lines without pausing to consider the accuracy and legitimacy of health officials’ and pediatrician claims.

A CBS Investigative Report, published in October 2012, exemplifies the unreliable and perhaps intentionally deceptive misinformation campaign steered by the US government health agencies every flu season. After the CDC refused to honor CBS’s Freedom of Information request to receive flu infection data by individual state, the network undertook an independent in…

Conflict is best avoided

Interpersonal conflict wastes valuable time and energy that could be better devoted to other, more fulfilling things.

Our energies are best spent creating a fulfilling life for ourselves and those we care about, not attempting to destroy another person, group or idea.


Everyone is entitled to their opinion, but the opinions of others are irrelevant in terms of how we wish to live our lives, and how we wish to interpret reality.


That is, we are under no obligation to listen to others or respond to them in any way.
Our lives are our own to create, and no one else's!


If we share a physical space with others, or trade goods and services with them, we will need to come to agreements, but otherwise our life is our own to create, in any way we see fit.

If others don't share our views or support our choices there is no need to fight them on it.
Instead, we must discover what works best for us and practice it, while allowing others the same freedom.
SHARKA TODD